Clients characterize Saul Ewing as an efficient, collaborative and pragmatic disputes firm, highlighting its communication, responsiveness, strategic advice and value. The team attracts particular praise for its availability and practical approach, with clients emphasizing “communication, legal strategy and case outcomes” and noting that its lawyers “work efficiently and pragmatically.”

Chicago partner Casey Grabenstein has taken a prominent role defending ten cannabis companies across twelve class actions challenging the classification and sale of cannabis concentrates. The litigation carries alleged aggregate exposure in the hundreds of millions of dollars and forms part of a broader national wave of approximately 20 related suits. His team secured seven dismissals in 2026, including five in federal court. Clients describe Grabenstein as an “exceptional strategic partner” who understands business objectives and delivers effective, efficient and creative solutions.

In Philadelphia, litigation chair Cathleen Devlin co-leads the defense in Luther Bond et al. v. Waste Management of Pennsylvania et al., a class action involving alleged nuisance and negligence arising from landfill operations. The team obtained dismissal of the negligence and public-nuisance claims, successfully opposed reconsideration and narrowed the dispute to private nuisance. Discovery has concluded, with trial anticipated in late 2026. A client describes Devlin as a “seasoned litigator” and highlights her defense of the university in a significant environmental matter.

Chesterbrook partner Blaine Feinauer is part of the team representing AEGIS and TIG Insurance in TIG Insurance Co. v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp., a reinsurance dispute exceeding $150 million. The matter examines fronting arrangements, allocation among reinsurers, “follow the fortunes” principles and the effect of an earlier commutation. Following a nine-day bench trial in February 2026, the case was submitted for decision. Client feedback also praises Feinauer for providing “outstanding support” to Justin Danilewitz and the wider outside counsel team.

Pennsylvania litigation vice chair Josh Richards handles higher education, commercial litigation and appeals. One client calls him its “go-to litigator,” noting that he regularly advises on internal grievance proceedings and handles the majority of its faculty, staff and student lawsuits.

Illinois class actions chair James Morsch focuses on insurance, antitrust, commercial disputes and class-action defense. A higher education client highlights his “deep expertise” in antitrust law and notes that he handles antitrust litigation for the institution as well as other higher education clients.

Pennsylvania white-collar and government-enforcement chair Justin Danilewitz serves as lead counsel in a client’s large tax dispute. The client praised his trial work, describing his arguments as clear and logical and noting his calm approach, leadership of the outside counsel team and sensible, well-reasoned advice. Additional feedback describes Danilewitz as smart, responsive, articulate, collaborative and strategic, as well as effective both in court and before senior leaders.

Illinois litigation vice chair George Apostolides focuses on commercial and bankruptcy disputes. Client feedback highlights his combination of technical expertise and practical judgment, particularly concerning debtor and creditor rights, audits and settlements. He is also praised for his responsiveness, clear communication and pragmatic approach to legal and business risk, with the client noting that his teams work efficiently and economically.

The broader practitioner bench also earns recognition. Kayleigh Keilty is described as an “exceptional litigator” who plays a key role throughout discovery and trial preparation, while Adam Fayne is praised for his ability to understand and communicate complex legal issues. Matt Haar is recognized for providing strong support to Danilewitz and the wider outside counsel team.

Across the practice, clients repeatedly return to Saul Ewing’s responsiveness and practicality. Feedback highlights immediate availability, reliable strategic advice and cost value, alongside strong command of complex factual records and effective trial advocacy. In clients’ words, the firm stands out for “strategic advice” and for lawyers who “work efficiently and pragmatically.”



Updated October 2026