Michael Duke is a founding partner of Elsberg Baker & Maruri.
Michael has represented clients in high-stakes commercial disputes across practice areas, having obtained successful outcomes in cases concerning complex financial instruments, debt restructuring, insurance disputes, mergers and acquisitions, and land use controversies. He has been recognized by Super Lawyers as a Rising Star in Business Litigation and twice in one week in The American Lawyer Litigation Daily as runner-up for Litigator of the Week.
Michael has been named among the Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in America as well as Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers. He has also been recognized by Super Lawyers as a Rising Star in Business Litigation and by Benchmark Litigation to its 40 & Under list.
Michael earned his J.D., summa cum laude, from Cornell Law School, where he was an Articles Editor for the Cornell Law Review. He served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Priscilla Richman of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and to the Honorable P. Kevin Castel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Year joined firm: 2024
Updated Feb 2026
Represented the former stockholders of the robotic medical devices company Auris Health against Johnson & Johnson in a ten-day trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery earn-out dispute centered around Johnson & Johnson’s post-merger failures to achieve regulatory and net-sales milestones, resulting in a judgment of over $1 billion for breach of contract and fraud.
Represented Cerberus Capital Management as plaintiff in a breach of contract action against the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, one of Canada’s largest banks, obtaining a $855 million judgment after a thirteen-day trial.
Defended a major energy company against a claim seeking up to $1 billion, obtaining an award in client’s favor after an eight-day confidential arbitration hearing.
Represented an ad hoc group of TriMark’s first lien term loan lenders as plaintiffs alleging that TriMark and several of its other lenders violated the governing credit agreement by exchanging the defendant lenders’ first lien term loans for new senior debt. After the court rejected motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ contract claims, the parties settled the case, with TriMark exchanging the plaintiffs’ debt for new super-senior debt and paying all lenders’ attorneys’ fees.
- Represented at the trial level an ad hoc group of Mitel’s first and second lien term loan lenders as plaintiffs. We alleged Mitel and several of its other lenders breached the governing credit agreements by exchanging the defendant lenders’ first and second lien term loans for new senior debt. After removal to the federal court, successfully remanded the case and defeated motions to dismiss.
- Appellate
- Arbitration
- Commercial
- Commercial disputes
- Labor and employment
- Plaintiff
- Financial services
- Investment management
- Pharmaceutical and life sciences
- Real estate
- J.D., Cornell Law School, 2016
- B.A., Political Science University of Tennessee, 2012
- The State Bar of New York, 2017
- United States Court for the Second Circuit, 2020
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2020
- United States Court for the Eastern District of New York, 2019
- United States Court for the Southern District of New York, 2019