Benchmark Litigation is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Key practice areas
Dispute resolution
Firm overview

Cravath strives to be the firm of choice for clients facing their most difficult and critical litigation. We are not just litigators; we are trial lawyers. We are trained across multiple disciplines, which enables us to think outside the box and apply creative solutions to complex matters, regardless of the subject matter, industry or client’s role in a particular dispute. The credibility and experience we bring to each matter and our preparation of each case from the outset as if it is going to trial give us a strategic advantage in all steps of litigation. Some of our practice areas include:

Antitrust: Since successfully defending IBM during the 1970s and 1980s in the landmark government case over alleged monopolization of the computer market, Cravath continues to be the go-to firm for major antitrust litigation. Our practice is led by two former Commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission—one of whom also served as U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust at the Department of Justice. We also represent clients in securing regulatory clearance for major transactions, advise clients on business conduct or potential investments and handle government investigations.

Appellate: We have extensive experience representing appellants and appellees in federal and state courts across the country. We regularly handle the appellate work for matters in which we conduct the trial court litigation, including interlocutory appeals and appeals following trial or other disposition. In addition, we are frequently retained to take over matters on appeal that were originally handled by another firm at the trial court level. We also prepare amicus briefs in connection with important cases pending in the U.S. Supreme Court or in other appellate courts in which our clients have an interest but are not parties.

Arbitration: Our litigators represent companies in many of the largest and most complex domestic and international arbitrations (including ICC, LCIA, AAA, JAMS, WIPO, CPR, UNCITRAL and private arbitrations) involving diverse industries and areas of law. Our attorneys are also from time to time nominated to serve as arbitrators by experienced litigators at other major firms.

Financial Restructuring and Reorganization: Companies facing their most challenging and critical litigation due to bankruptcy, restructuring or reorganization often rely upon our extensive experience in complex litigation. Our experience includes handling matters related to alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by officers and board members of distressed companies, disputes arising out of lender claims, alleged breaches of contract and alleged fraudulent conveyances.

General Commercial: Cravath regularly represents clients in high stakes commercial litigation. Our practice includes breach of contract, ERISA, False Claims Act, RICO, unfair competition and employment matters. We have also handled several environmental and product liability matters (including at trial) and numerous qui tam actions.

Intellectual Property: Our team includes the former head of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We handle patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret matters involving complex technologies and products, as well as commercial litigation that frequently arises from IP matters, such as antitrust and breach of license claims. We bring to each case a trial lawyer’s courtroom perspective and deep trial experience, which distinguish us from many firms who may be IP specialists but do not try cases on a regular basis. We also supervise and coordinate IP disputes that span the globe and regularly advise clients on national and worldwide IP strategy.

Investigations and Regulatory Enforcement: Cravath handles major white collar criminal defense matters, regulatory enforcement actions and investigations for corporations, both foreign and domestic, in diverse industries. We also assist clients in handling complex internal investigations, conduct fact-finding exercises with respect to shareholder demands and advise company executives and directors on compliance obligations, potential areas of exposure and preventive measures. We have extensive experience in matters involving digital assets, the FCPA, accounting and disclosure issues, environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, insider trading, tax evasion, potential executive misconduct, securities fraud, money laundering and anti-money laundering controls, healthcare fraud and criminal antitrust matters. Our team includes attorneys who have spent portions of their careers at U.S. government agencies.

Securities: We have achieved significant wins and established important precedent in mega-deal litigation, traditional securities fraud litigation and regulatory enforcement matters on behalf of every key category of defendant: issuers, financial institutions and audit firms. Our wins and innovative strategies from the boardroom to the courtroom have given corporate defendants greater ammunition to protect critical business interests and leveled the litigation playing field. While securities cases rarely go to trial, we draw on our extensive experience to successfully try these matters when necessary. In the past several years, we have tried nearly a dozen actions across the full spectrum of securities and shareholder litigation.


Updated Sep 2024

Address:
Two Manhattan West
375 Ninth Avenue
New York, NY 10001
Tel:+1 212 474 1000 Email:Contact Us Web Address:http://www.cravath.com
Linked Reviews
Dispute Resolution

Cravath Swaine & Moore continues to set the standard for other major business law firms. Its elite status as one of the “white-shoe” firms is acknowledged by contemporaries on a coast-to-coast basis and always with tones of reverence. “The Cravath style” has been used as a descriptor for firms aspiring to the same level of pedigree. “Cravath partners just carry the prestige with them daily. I even encounter partners who used to be with Cravath, and they still have this polish about them,” opines a peer. “Then you find out they are a Cravath alum, and it all makes sense.” The firm’s client roster is equally as “enviable,” and its partners service these blue-chip entities across a wide array of disciplines, most notably antitrust, commercial matters, securities, white-collar crime and even intellectual property.
     Cases concerning antitrust have been front-and-center as of late. “I feel like antitrust is the beating heart of Cravath right now,” speculates a peer. Lending further weight to this observation, the firm doubled down on this practice over the past year, hiring Andrew Finch, a seasoned authority in this area, from Paul Weiss. A team composed of Karin DeMasi, Christine Varney and Lauren Kennedy is representing the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and more than a dozen member plans as lead counsel in consolidated multidistrict antitrust litigation pending in Alabama federal court challenging foundational aspects of the Blue Cross Blue Shield System as anticompetitive. In a matter traversing the intersection of antitrust and securities, Antony Ryan and Yonaton Evensecured a favorable settlement for Qualcomm and certain of its directors and officers to resolve a consolidated class action stock-drop suit in California federal court filed in the wake of antitrust investigations and litigation concerning the company’s patent licensing and modem chipset businesses.  Plaintiffs alleged that defendants made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose material information concerning alleged anticompetitive conduct by Qualcomm to maintain a monopoly for semiconductors used in mobile phones, specifically with respect to licensing its standard essential patents on a non-discriminatory basis and to the bundling of license and chipset sales agreements.
     Michael Paskin and Helam
Gebremariam are representing Citigroup in putative class-action litigation brought by Loomis Sayles Trust in New York federal court concerning several large equity trades executed by Citigroup in March 2022.  Specifically, the plaintiff alleges that Citigroup breached its obligations as its broker by failing to properly follow the customer’s trading instructions in connection with the trades, and that this failure resulted in significant financial loss for the plaintiff and members of the proposed class, which brought claims for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, seeking compensation for alleged losses in excess of $70 million. The Cravath duo filed a motion for summary judgment in November 2023, which was granted in part in September 2024, denying plaintiff’s breach of fiduciary claim but allowing the contract claim to proceed to trial, pending the court’s ruling on motion for class certification, which was filed in October 2024. IP practitioner Keith Hummel and white-collar star Ben Gruenstein represented cardiovascular-centric medical device company Abiomed, as plaintiff in a trade secret and breach of contract action brought a German entity and its founder, with whom Abiomed entered into consulting agreements under which Abiomed confidentially shared valuable proprietary information and trade secrets. Abiomed alleged that the defendant company wrongfully disclosed Abiomed’s confidential information and trade secrets to a Chinese company that was also founded by the defendant founder and that this company—an Abiomed competitor—allegedly used this information to file Chinese patent applications claiming Abiomed’s intellectual property as its own.  In September 2023, the Cravath duo defeated defendants’ motion to dismiss, and the parties then reached a settlement and stipulated to the dismissal of the action in December 2024.  Kevin Orsini continues to hold firm to his growing reputation as another all-purpose trial powerhouse. “Kevin can do it all – antitrust, ‘event-driven litigation’ – and he never stays in one place,” commends a peer. “He’s doing antitrust one day and wildfire cases the next!” Illustrating his fluency with “event-driven litigation” (specifically the alluded-to wildfires) Orsini acts on a team with Omid Nasab, Timothy Cameron, Evan Norris, David Korn and Brittany Sukiennik representing utility Pacific Gas and Electric Company and its parent company PG&E Corporation in connection with more than 300 complaints filed in California state courts relating to the 2019 Kincade Fire, the 2020 Zogg Fire and the 2021 Dixie Fire. The complaints, filed on behalf of thousands of plaintiffs as well as a putative class, assert that PG&E’s alleged failure to properly maintain, inspect and de-energize its transmission and distribution lines was the cause of the fires. To date, the Cravath team has resolved approximately $2 billion in claims through settlements with insurance subrogation plaintiffs, various public entities and thousands of individual homeowners.

 

There are no results
Sponsored