Benchmark Litigation is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

This law firm has not supplied any contact details or supplementary information for this country or region. For more information about profiling options please contact Prin Shasiharan.
Rankings published in 2026
Commercial disputes
Tier 3
21 firms ranked
View full list

Tier 1

DeHeng Law Offices
3 practice areas
View full profile
Help Reaching Law Firm
4 practice areas
View profile
Jiaxuan Law Firm
4 practice areas
View profile
Yong Jia Xin Law Firm
3 practice areas
View profile

Tier 2

AllBright Law Offices
3 practice areas
View full profile
Dacheng Law Offices
3 practice areas
View full profile
Forever Law Firm
2 practice areas
View profile

Tier 3

Hai Run Law Firm
3 practice areas
View profile
Kangda Law Firm
3 practice areas
View profile
Tian Yuan Law Firm
3 practice areas
View full profile
Yingke Law Firm
2 practice areas
View profile
Zhizheng Law Firm
2 practice areas
View profile

Other Notable Firms

Duan & Duan Law Firm
2 practice areas
View profile
Guantao Law Firm
3 practice areas
View profile
Jincheng Tongda & Neal
3 practice areas
View profile
Jindi Law Firm
2 practice areas
View profile
JunHe
3 practice areas
View profile
Tahota Law Firm
3 practice areas
View full profile
V&T Law Firm
2 practice areas
View profile
XuXiaoPing Law Firm
1 practice area
View profile
Yingjiu Law Firm
1 practice area
View profile
Construction and real estate
Recommended
13 firms ranked
View full list

Highly Recommended

DeHeng Law Offices
3 practice areas
View full profile
Help Reaching Law Firm
4 practice areas
View profile
Jiaxuan Law Firm
4 practice areas
View profile
Yong Jia Xin Law Firm
3 practice areas
View profile

Recommended

AllBright Law Offices
3 practice areas
View full profile
Dacheng Law Offices
3 practice areas
View full profile
Grandway Law Offices
2 practice areas
View profile
Hui Ye Law Firm
3 practice areas
View full profile
Jincheng Tongda & Neal
3 practice areas
View profile
JunHe
3 practice areas
View profile
Kangda Law Firm
3 practice areas
View profile
Tahota Law Firm
3 practice areas
View full profile
Tian Yuan Law Firm
3 practice areas
View full profile
Linked Reviews
Dispute Resolution

One of the earliest law firms in China, Beijing Kangda Law Firm sees dispute resolution as one of its core strengths. It focuses on disputes in the fields of securities, equity, investment funds, real estate, and labour and employment. The firm is also particularly known for its expertise in government and regulatory, and criminal disputes. 

Key names include Yan Lian, Junxi Lu and Jun Liu.  

The firm represented China Resources Land in a post-acquisition dispute arising from a breach of valuation shortfall compensation obligations. After the client acquired several medical and elderly care service entities—sectors with which it had limited prior experience—the counterparty refused to perform contractual compensation and equity pledge obligations. The legal team reviewed extensive materials to ascertain the true intent of the transaction, gathered supporting evidence, and filed a lawsuit with the Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court. The firm’s precise handling of the case, which involved complex M&A structuring and state-owned enterprise considerations, received strong recognition from the client. 

Beijing Kangda Law Firm, led by partner Lu Junxi, acted as defense counsel in a high-stakes equity transfer dispute involving Shanghai Jinxin Investment Consulting Partnership and Everbright Jinhui Investment Management (collectively “Everbright”) against Beijing Baofeng Technology and its legal representative Feng. The claimants sought approximately RMB 750 million in damages and interest for alleged breach of repurchase obligations, with further claims of RMB 4.62 billion threatened. The case arose from the high-profile Italian MPS project acquisition failure, and its outcome bore directly on Baofeng’s solvency. Retained in August 2019 under a base-plus-contingency fee arrangement, the firm secured a complete first-instance victory before the Beijing High People’s Court in 2020, with all claims dismissed. 

There are no results
Sponsored