Benchmark Litigation is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

88 results88 results
1
of
5
The 2026 Asia-Pacific Awards recognized leading disputes firms and practitioners across the region, with data pointing to a deepening China litigation market
BenchmarkLitigation
View the winners of this year's awards, including Top 100 Women in Litigation and Top 40 under 40
BenchmarkLitigation
After months of comprehensive research into the top disputes firms in the region, we are delighted to showcase our findings
BenchmarkLitigation
After months of comprehensive research into the top disputes firms in the region, we are delighted to showcase our findings
BenchmarkLitigation
Benchmark Litigation中国很高兴地宣布第二届Benchmark Litigation中国奖的入围名单!
BenchmarkLitigation
View the latest litigation firm rankings and litigation stars!
BenchmarkLitigation
现可查看我们最新的律所排名!
Sponsored

Sponsored

  • Sponsored by East & Concord Partners
    Recent Victorious Judgment Obtained by East and Concord Partners Chengdu Office Sets Precedential Guidance on Confusion-Based Unfair Competition Under the Anti-Unfair Competition Law
  • Sponsored by East & Concord Partners
    An arbitration case concerning a foreign-related share redemption dispute, jointly handled by partners Wang Yupeng and Yang Yingzhi from the Beijing office of East & Concord Partners, has been selected for inclusion in the Compilation of Foreign-Related Commercial Arbitration Cases, compiled by the Guangzhou Arbitration Commission and published by China Legal Publishing House.
  • Sponsored by Duane Morris & Selvam
    Kompetenz-Kompetenz is the universally accepted principle that empowers arbitration tribunals to decide on their own jurisdiction. However, recent decisions in the Indian Supreme Court and the Singapore High Court provide timely reminders on whether and when such jurisdictional rulings can be referred to the local supervisory court. Parties must remember the inconsistency across jurisdictions in timings its challenge to the Tribunal’s ruling on jurisdiction.