Benchmark Litigation is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

District of Columbia

2026_BM US_Recommended Firm.png
Key practice areas
Copyright & related rights
Intellectual property
Patent disputes
Trade mark disputes
Trade mark
Patent
Patent prosecution
Trade mark prosecution
Dispute resolution
Firm overview

Full-service IP firm: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is one of the world’s leading intellectual property law firms, practicing all aspects of patent, trademark, and copyright law. It is a true one-stop shop for all IP matters, with experts in every area of IP and technology. The firm also provides counseling and litigation services in advertising, privacy, and a wide spectrum of additional IP-adjacent commercial matters. Its comprehensive approach to clients’ IP needs and Finnegan’s mega-boutique size underpins its year-to-year, decade-to-decade pre-eminence in IP litigation across all industries and tribunals.

Global presence: With offices in the United States, Asia, and Europe, Finnegan’s multinational team represents clients on IP issues relating to European, German, UK, and U.S. IP law.

Industry and technical expertise: Finnegan offers full-service IP legal and technical experience in virtually every industry and technology: biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, biologics and biosimilars, combination products, chemicals, oil and gas, electronics, semiconductors, computers and software, FinTech, Internet of Things (IoT), automotive, aerospace and aviation, industrial manufacturing, consumer products, food and beverage, outdoor recreation, sports and fitness, digital health, medical devices, clean energy and renewables, robotics, textiles, artificial intelligence (AI), and 3D printing.

IP-focused talent: With Finnegan’s practice centered on intellectual property, the firm is positioned to create economies of scale and focus all resources on providing the best tools and teams for clients. In the past five years, Finnegan has filed over 675 IP-related district court cases. The firm’s team is comprised of over 250 litigators, including career trial attorneys. Over 275 of Finnegan’s legal professionals hold degrees in scientific disciplines (more than 75 hold PhDs). Over 215 professionals are registered to practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), European Patent Office (EPO), the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA), the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

ANDA litigation: Since being involved in the very first ANDA litigation, Finnegan has been a leading firm representing innovative pharmaceutical companies before federal district courts and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Our successes derive from a deep bench of experienced and technically sophisticated attorneys who understand the long-term plans of innovative pharmaceutical companies, as well as the legal particularities of ANDA litigation under the Hatch-Waxman Act and the nuances of pharmaceutical patent law. Over the last five years, our attorneys have represented more than 20 brand companies in more than 450 ANDA litigations involving revolutionary drugs such as Brilinta®, Farxiga®, Relistor®, Jublia®, Aptiom®, KISQALI®, ORILISSA®, and Abilify®. We consistently have 150+ ongoing ANDA litigations every year, providing counselling and litigation services for a range of technologies such as antibodies, automated DNA sequencing, diagnostics, imaging agents and other research tools, molecular mechanism infringement claims, and protein therapies.

International Trade Commission (ITC) litigation: When it comes to ITC litigation, Finnegan was litigating IP cases at the ITC long before it became the popular forum it is today. Litigating in the ITC presents a unique challenge—litigating a technologically complicated case in a short period of time, in a pressure-packed forum that can make or break the commercial success of the products at issue. At the ITC, summary determination is rare, and approximately 45 percent of Section 337 cases go to trial, all in front of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), not a jury. When choosing a firm to litigate in the ITC, trial experience in the ITC is of paramount importance. In the past five years, Finnegan attorneys have been involved in more than 10 percent of Section 337 cases. Over 150 of the firm’s attorneys have litigated at the ITC. Finnegan also has practitioners with ITC experience in the chemical, pharmaceutical, and mechanical fields. Our attorneys have even tried ITC cases involving design patents and trademarks. During the past two years, more than half of all ITC cases have involved electrical and IT- related technologies and semiconductors; Finnegan has more than 80 lawyers and over 20 professionals who have at least one degree in electrical engineering, computer science, or some other related form of specialized technology.

Trademark litigation: Finnegan’s trademark litigation practice spans numerous industries and covers all types of trademark rights, including service marks, trade dress, product configuration, trade names, domain names, letters, numbers, colors, and telephone numbers. Representing both plaintiffs and defendants, our lawyers have decades of experience litigating both large and small trademark cases before courts throughout the country and regularly appear before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and its Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), the federal circuit courts of appeal, district courts, and other tribunals. We have an impressive track record of favorably resolving litigious matters for our clients, whether by choosing a forum that gives clients the best chance to win on the law, filing a motion to dismiss, obtaining an early temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, positioning a case for settlement, moving for summary judgment, or taking the case to trial. One of our strengths is the use of experts to enhance our clients’ legal positions. For many years, we have worked with numerous consumer survey experts on a wide range of issues in trademark litigation, including likelihood of confusion, likelihood of dilution, genericness, secondary meaning, and fame. We also make strategic use of other experts in areas such as linguistics, marketing, consumer psychology, industry practices, and damages.

Practice Areas:

  • Advertising
  • Copyright
  • Design Rights
  • European, German, and UK IP Law
  • Export Control
  • IP Litigation
  • Patent Office Examinations
  • Patent Portfolio Management, Monetization, and Transactions
  • Post-Grant Proceedings
  • Privacy
  • Trademark
  • Trade Secrets

Other Offices:

North America: Atlanta · Boston · Palo Alto · Reston · Washington, DC

Europe: London · Munich

Asia: Seoul · Shanghai · Taipei · Tokyo

 

Updated Sep 2024

Address:
901 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC
20001
Tel:+1 202 408 4000 Fax:+1 202 408 4400 Web Address:https://www.finnegan.com
Rankings published in 2025
Dispute resolution
Recommended
55 firms ranked
View full list

Recommended

Akerman
4 practice areas
View full profile
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
5 practice areas
View profile
Blank Rome
4 practice areas
View full profile
Caplin & Drysdale
1 practice area
View profile
Cohen Milstein
2 practice areas
View profile
Debevoise & Plimpton
5 practice areas
View full profile
Dechert
1 practice area
View profile
Eversheds Sutherland
1 practice area
View profile
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner
9 practice areas
View full profile
Hausfeld
1 practice area
View full profile
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
1 practice area
View full profile
Hunton Andrews Kurth
10 practice areas
View full profile
Ifrah Law
1 practice area
View full profile
Massey & Gail
1 practice area
View profile
McDermott Will & Schulte
5 practice areas
View profile
Milbank
1 practice area
View full profile
MoloLamken
1 practice area
View full profile
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe
4 practice areas
View profile
Paul Hastings
5 practice areas
View profile
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison
4 practice areas
View full profile
Proskauer
2 practice areas
View full profile
Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg
5 practice areas
View full profile
Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck
6 practice areas
View profile
Rule Garza Howley
1 practice area
View full profile
Schertler Onorato Mead & Sears
1 practice area
View profile
Steptoe
4 practice areas
View profile
Sullivan & Cromwell
6 practice areas
View full profile
Venable
9 practice areas
View profile
Vinson & Elkins
1 practice area
View profile
Wiley Rein
4 practice areas
View profile
Zuckerman Spaeder
1 practice area
View profile

Highly Recommended

Arnold & Porter
9 practice areas
View profile
Baker Botts
4 practice areas
View profile
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
1 practice area
View profile
Covington & Burling
9 practice areas
View profile
Davis Polk & Wardwell
1 practice area
View full profile
Dunn Isaacson Rhee
1 practice area
View full profile
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
5 practice areas
View full profile
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
9 practice areas
View profile
Jones Day
10 practice areas
View profile
Kellogg Hansen Todd Figel & Frederick
1 practice area
View profile
King & Spalding
4 practice areas
View full profile
Kirkland & Ellis
9 practice areas
View profile
Latham & Watkins
5 practice areas
View full profile
Mayer Brown
4 practice areas
View profile
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
10 practice areas
View profile
O'Melveny & Myers
1 practice area
View profile
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
1 practice area
View full profile
Sidley Austin
4 practice areas
View full profile
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
1 practice area
View full profile
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom
1 practice area
View full profile
White & Case
4 practice areas
View profile
Wilkinson Stekloff
1 practice area
View full profile
Williams & Connolly
5 practice areas
View full profile
WilmerHale
4 practice areas
View full profile
10 results10 results
The IP powerhouse is locked in battle with King & Spalding in a trade secrets case that could be shifted from the US to Germany
Sponsored