Benchmark Litigation is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Key contacts
Managing Director : Loh Wai Yue
Deputy Managing Director: Davis Tan
Quick facts
Partners

6

Other qualified practitioners

14

Total number of lawyers

20

Practitioners (worldwide)

20

Languages

English, Chinese, Bahasa Indonesia, Malay, Tamil

Network memberships

DAC Beachcroft Hong Kong

Key practice areas
Dispute resolution
Shipping
Commodities and trade
Firm overview

Since its establishment in 2010, Incisive Law LLC has earned a reputation for shaping Singapore’s jurisprudence in shipping and international trade, while delivering legal solutions grounded in commercial reality. The firm remains well equipped to support all stages of maritime and trade activity from ship financing, shipbuilding, and vessel sale and purchase to charterparty claims, cargo disputes, marine casualties (including collisions, fires, crew claims), and ship arrests. It also regularly advises on commodity-related disputes, quality/contamination issues, trade finance (including letters of credit and bills of exchange), export licence compliance and other international trade matters. 

Beyond shipping and trade, Incisive Law offers a full range of corporate, finance, regulatory, employment, restructuring, property, and private client services, enabling holistic support for cross-practice matters. 

Operating from Singapore, Incisive Law advises on Singapore and English law, and engages regularly in domestic and international arbitral forums. A key strategic development is its association with DAC Beachcroft, formalized in September 2023, by which Incisive collaborates in areas of shipping, trade, and commodities across Asia-Pacific. Wai Yue Loh plays a pivotal role in aligning this trans-jurisdictional collaboration, especially given the recent expansion of DAC Beachcroft into Hong Kong. In 2024, Incisive secured an appointment as a legal correspondent in Singapore for a major International Group Protection & Indemnity (P&I) Club, further solidifying its standing in the maritime insurance and casualty domain.

The firm recently celebrated notable appellate victories, most significantly the Court of Appeal win in Argoglobal Underwriting Asia Pacific Pte Ltd and others v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited [2026] SGCA 14, in which the firm acted for a group of five marine insurers in overturning a High Court judgment and defeating a USD 56 million marine insurance claim after nearly eight years of litigation. The Court of Appeal delivered authoritative guidance on the burden of proof in perils of the seas claims and the requirements for establishing constructive total loss. The firm also secured a landmark decision in The Sea Justice [2024] SGCA 32, showcasing its strength in high-stakes maritime litigation. In shipping disputes, Incisive's team is recognized for its work in charterparty claims, cargo disputes, marine casualties, and ship arrests, a track record highlighted by the Legal 500 in its rankings. The firm acts for significant clients including Unipec (in interpleader and admiralty matters) and the Swedish Club in collision and limitation cases, amongst others.

Key practice areas
  • Arbitration
  • Commercial and transactions
  • Commercial disputes
  • Dispute resolution
  • Energy and construction
  • Insurance
  • International arbitration
  • Labor and employment
  • Private client
  • Shipping
  • Trade and customs
  • White collar crime
Key practice contacts & recent matter highlights

Loh Wai Yue, Shipping, waiyue.loh@incisivelaw.com

  • Acted for the hull insurers in Argoglobal Underwriting Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited [2026] SGCA 14, a complex marine casualty claim exceeding US$70 million arising from the capsize of the vessel TERAS LYZA during a tow voyage in 2018. Successfully overturned the High Court’s decision in its entirety and secured a complete victory for the clients. The Court of Appeal held that the insured had failed to prove both loss by a peril of the seas and constructive total loss, delivering a seminal judgment on marine insurance law in Singapore.
  • Acting for the Singapore subsidiary of a Chinese State-Owned trading company in one of the biggest litigations that has come before the Singapore High Courts arising from the collapse of a prominent Singapore oil trading house which has spawned various suits in connection with this collapse. The case reference number of the above matters before the Singapore High Court are as follows: (a) HC /OS 489/2020; (b) HC/ OS 549/ 2020; (c) HC / OS 593 /2020; (d) HC/ OS 616 /2020; (e) HC / OS 631/ 2020.
  • Successfully represented and acted as lead counsel for the owners of the “SEA JUSTICE” before the Singapore High Court and the Court of Appeal following a collision between the “SEA JUSTICE” and “A SYMPHONY” involving a stay of admiralty proceedings in Singapore on forum non conveniens grounds in favour of the PRC: The “Sea Justice” [2024] SGHC 37 & The “Sea Justice” [2024] SGCA 32.

Davis Tan, Shipping, davis.tan@incisivelaw.com

  • The case contributed to Singapore jurisprudence on determining the appropriate forum for wrongful arrest claims where the substantive dispute is stayed in favour of arbitration. The Singapore Court’s decision has been reported in C.U. Lines Limited. v Owner of the vessel(s) “HONG CHANG SHENG” [2025] SGHCR 31. The judgment highlighted that it touched on “the novel question of whether the court has a residual discretion not to enforce a consent order concerning where and how parties’ disputes were to be determined” in the context of an admiralty dispute.
  • The firm further successfully resisted applications for extension of time to appeal and applications for permission to appeal, resulting in a key Singapore Court of Appeal decision reported in Cao Pei v McCom Holding Ltd [2025] SGCA 24; [2025] 1 SLR 745. The decision laid down the guiding principles on delay arising from the mistakes of counsel in the context of applications for extension of time to appeal.
  • A multi-jurisdictional dispute, with actions commenced in both Luxembourg and Singapore. Bankruptcy application was commenced in Luxembourg, and in response, an anti-suit injunction was obtained in Singapore on an urgent basis against proceedings in Luxembourg. The Luxembourg proceedings were subsequently dismissed and substantive proceedings are presently proceeding in the Singapore Courts. The case highlights the increasing number of investment and commercial disputes handled by Incisive Law LLC.
Sector expertise
  • Banking
  • Energy
  • Financial services
  • Insurance
  • Oil and gas
  • Shipping
Address:
120 Robinsons Rd , #08-01
068913, Singapore
Tel:+6565050160 Email:Contact Us Web Address:https://incisivelaw.com/
Rankings published in 2026
Commodities and trade
Recommended
8 firms ranked
View full list

Highly Recommended

Blackstone & Gold
6 practice areas
View full profile
Helmsman
7 practice areas
View profile
Joseph Tan Jude Benny
8 practice areas
View profile
Rajah & Tann
9 practice areas
View profile

Recommended

Fullerton Law Chambers
9 practice areas
View full profile
Incisive Law
3 practice areas
View full profile
Joseph Lopez
5 practice areas
View profile
Watershed Law
6 practice areas
View full profile
Shipping
Tier 3
29 firms ranked
View full list

Tier 1

Allen & Gledhill
18 practice areas
View full profile
Rajah & Tann
9 practice areas
View profile

Tier 2

Clyde & Co Clasis
8 practice areas
View profile
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson
16 practice areas
View full profile
Focus Law Asia
6 practice areas
View full profile
Helmsman
7 practice areas
View profile
Joseph Tan Jude Benny
8 practice areas
View profile
LVM Law Chambers
7 practice areas
View profile
Morgan Lewis Stamford
9 practice areas
View profile
Oon & Bazul Law
5 practice areas
View profile
Shook Lin & Bok (Singapore)
17 practice areas
View profile
Virtus Law
6 practice areas
View profile

Tier 3

Ang & Partners
1 practice area
View profile
Ascendant Legal
5 practice areas
View profile
AsiaLegal
2 practice areas
View profile
DennisMathiew
2 practice areas
View profile
Gurbani & Co
2 practice areas
View profile
Haridass Ho & Partners
1 practice area
View profile
Incisive Law
3 practice areas
View full profile
Ming Law Asia
3 practice areas
View profile
PDLegal
8 practice areas
View profile
Resource Law
2 practice areas
View profile
WongPartnership
18 practice areas
View profile

Tier 4

Blackstone & Gold
6 practice areas
View full profile
Joseph Lopez
5 practice areas
View profile
Watershed Law
6 practice areas
View full profile

Other Notable Firms

Fullerton Law Chambers
9 practice areas
View full profile
Niru & Co
3 practice areas
View profile
Stoa Law Corporation
1 practice area
View profile
Linked Reviews
Dispute Resolution

Incisive Law is a boutique renowned for its shipping and international trade disputes practice. Established in 2010, the firm has been instrumental in shaping Singapore’s modern maritime jurisprudence while providing practical, commercially grounded advice across the full spectrum of maritime and trade conflicts. With expertise spanning dry shipping, commodities, marine insurance, and admiralty law, the firm is equipped to handle everything from charterparty and cargo claims to major marine casualties and ship-arrest litigation. The firm complements this sector focus with support in related areassuch as trade finance, regulatory compliance, and insolvencygiving clients a holistic disputes offering across the broader supply chain.  

Incisive Law has featured as counsel in some of the most consequential shipping and trade disputes in the region. It regularly acts for blue-chip clients like Unipec in multi-faceted litigation connected to global trading failures, and for leading marine insurers like The Swedish Club in complex collision and limitation-of-liability cases. The firm’s lawyers also engage frequently in international arbitrations on commodities, charterparty, and shipbuilding disputes, providing strategic advice under both Singapore and English law when contracts call for foreign governing law or overseas forums.  

The disputes team is led by Joint Managing Director Wai Yue Loh, a senior accredited maritime law specialist, and John Seow, its Head of Litigation and a former marine engineer turned lawyer. Both are accomplished advocates who regularly represent clients in the Singapore courts and international arbitrations. They are joined by admiralty law expert Augustine Liew, who came on board in 2024 after decades at a rival boutique to expand Incisive’s blue-water capabilities, and Davis Tan, who was recruited in early 2025 as Deputy Head of Litigation from a leading firm to strengthen the practice’s cross-border reach (including Greater China work). Under this leadership, the firm has seen a surge in high-profile mandates over the past year, navigating headline-grabbing cases that have tested new points of law. Notably, in 2024 Incisive Law formalized an association with DAC Beachcroft, a global firm, to broaden its Asia-Pacific network, and earned appointment as Singapore counsel to a major International Group P&I Club. 

Recent case highlights demonstrate the team’s prowess in complex, high-value disputes. In a marquee engagement stemming from the collapse of oil trader Hin Leong Trading, the firm represented Chinese petroleum giant Unipec’s Singapore subsidiary in defending its title to S$300 million worth of marine fuel cargoes. Led by Loh, the team successfully guided Unipec through urgent steps like obtaining a worldwide cargo freeze and preparing for a complex multi-party trial. The legal issues are novel and wide-rangingfrom questions of title to goods under bills of lading to tricky intersections of shipping law, secured financing, and insolvency rules.  

In marine insurance, the firm recently scored a significant win with judgment in the Teras Lyza liftboat sinking case. The lawyers acted for a syndicate of insurers, led by MS First Capital, defending against a US$70 million claim after a newly built offshore vessel capsized on its maiden voyage in 2018. The insurers denied the claim on grounds of alleged non-compliance with policy warranties and argued the policy was effectively void; the insured owners and mortgagee sued in the Singapore High Court. After a full trial in late 2024, the judge ruled in the insurers’ favour in a landmark decision. Notably, this was the first Singapore judgment to apply provisions of the UK’s Insurance Act 2015 and to revisit century-old principles from the Marine Insurance Act 1906. The case has now gone up on appeal, but the High Court’s findings that addressed issues such as the effect of extended vessel lay-ups on policy coverage and the enforceability of policy warranties have been hailed as a watershed in Singapore’s marine insurance law.  

Another showcase matter for the firm was the high-stakes collision dispute between the bulk carrier Sea Justice and the vessel A SymphonyThe Incisive team represented the Sea Justice’s owners and their P&I Club, the Swedish Club, in Singapore proceedings that raised delicately balanced questions of jurisdiction and international maritime comity. The firm’s clients won a precedent-setting judgment in the Singapore Court of Appeal which confirmed that once a shipowner establishes a limitation fund in its chosen forum, Singapore courts should stay any duplicative local actions and disallow claimants from retaining security from an arrested vessel. This appellate victory provided clarity on an unsettled point of admiralty law, that a shipowner’s right to limit liability in a jurisdiction of its choosing will be respected, preventing claimants from using Singapore’s higher liability limits to circumvent foreign limitation proceedings.  

Client feedback 

For shipping and marine insurance, they offer clear adviceguidance and suggestions on actions to be taken to safeguard one's interest.” -  Insurance 

Lawyers are knowledgeable and offer a quick turnaround time.” - Intellectual property 

The team is commercially minded and possess a mastery of legal technicalities.” - Shipping 

Very responsive, commercial and cost effective.” - Shipping 

Augustine Liew 

He is a very experienced lawyer that can advise on both Singapore and English law disputes. He's also very cost-effective and commercial. I highly recommend him.” 

He always provides sound commercial and legal advice.” 

Augustine Liew really needs no introduction.” 

Shanen Nanoo 

He is approachable, knows his stuff and offers a clear presentation and framework to solutions or proposals. 
 
Shanen has the ability to cut the crux of a matter, which gives him an edge in finding the silver bullet for clients who want a swift, favorable, commercial resolution of a matter.  
 
Devastatingly clever, Shanen is the natural successor of admiralty heavyweight Augustine Liew, and I have no hesitation in endorsing him.” 

3 results3 results
Sponsored