Benchmark Litigation is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

This law firm has not supplied any contact details or supplementary information for this country or region. For more information about profiling options please contact Prin Shasiharan.
Rankings published in 2025
Dispute resolution
Recommended
83 firms ranked
View full list

Recommended

Adkisson Pitet
1 practice area
View full profile
Allen Matkins
3 practice areas
View profile
Alto Litigation
2 practice areas
View full profile
Altshuler Berzon
2 practice areas
View profile
Andrade Gonzalez
2 practice areas
View profile
Arnold & Porter
10 practice areas
View profile
Bergeson
1 practice area
View profile
Bunsow De Mory
11 practice areas
View full profile
Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass
5 practice areas
View profile
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy
3 practice areas
View profile
DTO Law
1 practice area
View profile
Dan Tan Law
1 practice area
View profile
Davis Wright Tremaine
7 practice areas
View profile
Dechert
1 practice area
View profile
Delman Vukmanovic
1 practice area
View profile
Everett Dorey
1 practice area
View profile
Fish & Richardson
5 practice areas
View profile
Fisher Phillips
2 practice areas
View profile
Glaser Weil
8 practice areas
View profile
Gluck Daniel Atkinson
1 practice area
View profile
Greenberg Gross
2 practice areas
View profile
Haight Brown & Bonesteel
1 practice area
View profile
Halpern May Ybarra Gelberg
2 practice areas
View profile
Hodes Milman
2 practice areas
View profile
Irell & Manella
9 practice areas
View profile
Jones Day
11 practice areas
View profile
Joseph Saveri Law Firm
3 practice areas
View profile
Kasowitz LLP
6 practice areas
View full profile
Kaufhold Gaskin
1 practice area
View full profile
Keller Anderle Scolnick LLP
1 practice area
View profile
Kendall Brill & Kelly
2 practice areas
View profile
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
10 practice areas
View profile
Kinsella Holley Iser Kump Steinsapir
2 practice areas
View profile
Knobbe Martens
9 practice areas
View profile
Kwun Bhansali Lazarus
1 practice area
View profile
Larson LLP
1 practice area
View profile
Lewis & Llewellyn
1 practice area
View profile
Loeb & Loeb
7 practice areas
View profile
Milbank
6 practice areas
View full profile
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
13 practice areas
View profile
Musick Peeler & Garrett
1 practice area
View profile
Proskauer
9 practice areas
View full profile
Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg
6 practice areas
View full profile
Shook Hardy & Bacon
2 practice areas
View profile
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
5 practice areas
View full profile
Stris & Maher
1 practice area
View profile
Swanson & McNamara
2 practice areas
View profile
Turner Boyd Seraphine
1 practice area
View profile
Umberg Zipser
2 practice areas
View profile
Waymaker
2 practice areas
View profile
Weil Gotshal & Manges
8 practice areas
View full profile
White & Case
4 practice areas
View profile
Willkie Farr & Gallagher
1 practice area
View full profile
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
10 practice areas
View profile
Winston Taylor
10 practice areas
View profile

Highly Recommended

Berman Tabacco
3 practice areas
View full profile
Bird Marella LLP
3 practice areas
View profile
Cooley
12 practice areas
View profile
Covington & Burling
5 practice areas
View profile
Davis Polk & Wardwell
6 practice areas
View full profile
Farella Braun & Martel
5 practice areas
View profile
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
9 practice areas
View full profile
Goodwin Procter
1 practice area
View profile
Hueston Hennigan
7 practice areas
View full profile
Keker Van Nest & Peters
9 practice areas
View profile
King & Spalding
8 practice areas
View full profile
Kirkland & Ellis
8 practice areas
View profile
Latham & Watkins
8 practice areas
View full profile
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein
5 practice areas
View profile
Mayer Brown
6 practice areas
View profile
Morrison Foerster
12 practice areas
View profile
Munger Tolles & Olson
10 practice areas
View profile
O'Melveny & Myers
11 practice areas
View profile
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe
12 practice areas
View profile
Paul Hastings
8 practice areas
View profile
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison
2 practice areas
View full profile
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
10 practice areas
View full profile
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd
3 practice areas
View full profile
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
15 practice areas
View profile
Sidley Austin
8 practice areas
View full profile
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom
1 practice area
View full profile
Susman Godfrey
4 practice areas
View full profile
Willenken
1 practice area
View full profile
Linked Reviews
Dispute Resolution

A full-service firm with a national, and global, footprint, Loeb & Loeb provides a wide array of legal services through its six offices throughout the US and two in China. In litigation specifically, the firm has deep ties to the entertainment industry. “It’s really time to take a closer look at Loeb & Loeb,” advises one contemporary. “For entertainment litigation, they are really quite dominant. They have some strong connections there, some very high-profile clients.” Another insists, “They have one of the best trust-and-estates groups in the country, and this is going to be a crazy growth area.”

     Not surprisingly, much of this is serviced by practitioners in its Los Angeles office. A team of Loeb litigators, led by partner Jim Curry, represents CBS in litigation relating to the popular daytime television program, “Judge Judy,” including defending CBS against first-of-their-kind cases involving claims that a sale of a television library should trigger a “buy-out” of the profit participant’s interest. The Loeb team also previously defended CBS against a related case where a former agent and profit participant sought a declaration that Judge Judy’s salary is too high and should not be deducted as a profit participation. Curry and his team won the case on appeal of the granting of summary judgment to CBS. “Jim Curry does a lot of work that many entertainment lawyers don’t like to do, like accounting disputes and audit claims, which is when someone is a participant in a TV show or a film and they see the accounting sheet and the film or show is underwater, so they dispute the accounting.” David Grossman is defending Paramount Pictures against the estate of Truman Capote in a lawsuit in which the estate is claims that they own the rights to the 1961 film Breakfast at Tiffany’s. The suit involves complex copyright questions, including questions related to the granting of rights by the Estate to Paramount. Grossman is also defending NBCUniversal, actor Gary Oldman and Working Title Group against claims of breach of implied in-fact contract and interference brought by a writer alleging that material from his working scripts about Winston Churchill ended up in the film Darkest Hour without credit or compensation.

Grossman also defended Netflix and the creators of the Netflix hit television series Stranger Things, against a copyright infringement case in which the screenwriter and producer filed suit asserting, among other claims, that the show included elements from the writer’s undeveloped screenplays and in particular that the “Shadow Monster” was based on a character the plaintiff created. LA partners John Gatti and Lauren Friedrepresent Miramax and its related licensees, including Amazon and Walmart, among others, in a suit brought by a photographer that claimed to own the rights to an iconic photograph of Uma Thurman used in a poster for the movie “Pulp Fiction,” which Miramax produced. After decades of Miramax licensing the image, the photographer claimed for the first time in his 2020 lawsuit that he owned the photograph, that Miramax had no right to exploit the photo in any way, and that Miramax and each of its licensees were liable for copyright infringement. The Loeb team successfully secured an order that the photographer was late in filing any copyright registration, thereby limiting the alleged damages. Gatti and Fried also represent singer/songwriter Tracy Chapman in a copyright-infringement case based on rapper and songwriter Nicki Minaj’s sampling of Chapman’s works without permission. On summary judgment, the district court found triable issues of fact as to whether Minaj could be held liable on Chapman’s distribution claim and set a date for trial. Minaj subsequently agreed to pay Chapman the full amount of damages sought and judgment was entered in the federal court case in Chapman’s favor for nearly half a million dollars.
     Operating from the firm’s New York office, Barry Slotnick and Tal Dickstein

are defending rapper Roddy Ricch, as well as songwriters, music publishers and the record label, against a copyright infringement suit alleging that Ricch used part of songwriter Greg Perry’s 1975 soul song “Come on Down” in Ricch’s 2019 hit “The Box.” This same pair is defending a number of individuals and entities against copyright infringement claims brought by Chris Brown involving the rights to the motion picture Down For Life.

 

Sponsored