Benchmark Litigation is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Key contacts
Kenneth Trujillo-Jamison: Managing Partner
Paul Loh: Partner
Jason Wilson: Partner
Eileen Ahern: Partner
Quick facts
Partners

5

Other qualified practitioners

5

Total number of lawyers

10

Practitioners (worldwide)

10

Languages

English, Mandarin

Network memberships

NAMWOLF, NAPABA, CMCP, LCLD, ACC

Key practice areas
Dispute resolution
Firm overview

Willenken LLP is a preeminent litigation boutique without peer in trial experience and strategic acumen. An elite, minority-owned law firm, we are equally skilled in the art of taking a hostile witness on cold cross as we are at penning a cogent dispositive motion. We are the go-to firm of Fortune 500 companies for their most challenging, complex business litigation matters. Firm-wide, our attorneys have tried over 200 cases to verdict or judgment. We thrive on providing last-minute trial representation to clients in high-stakes lawsuits.

We represent both plaintiffs and defendants and focus exclusively on complex commercial litigation, with special emphasis on class action defense, real estate litigation, intellectual property, entertainment litigation, complex contract disputes, product liability litigation, trade secrets, and utility regulatory matters. Willenken is based in Los Angeles and our attorneys handle cases nationwide. True to our roots as trial lawyers, we are guided by one overriding principle: Winning Matters®.

Willenken and its lawyers have been recognized by leading independent legal and business publications, including Best Lawyers, Benchmark Litigation, The American Lawyer, Chambers and Partners, Daily Journal, Corporate Counsel, Lawdragon, and Los Angeles Business Journal.

As a certified minority-owned law firm, diversity and inclusion are hallmarks of our practice. We staff our cases with a diverse group of partners and associates by virtue of the composition of our firm. Furthermore, we are proud and active members of the California Minority Counsel Program, the Minority Corporate Counsel Association, the Leadership Counsel on Legal Diversity, and the National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms, among other notable organizations.

Updated Sep 2025

Key practice contacts & recent matter highlights

Paul Loh    
Commercial    
ploh@willenken.com

  • We prevailed in a high-stakes breach of contract case touted by the pharmaceutical industry press as “one of the five big healthcare lawsuits.” On behalf of AbbVie, the firm filed suit in Delaware Chancery Court concerning the breach of a pharmaceutical supply contract arising out of the world-wide shortage of Lupron, the leading drug for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. In late 2019, Lupron’s manufacturer, Takeda, experienced production disruptions at its Hikari, Japan plant due to quality issues that were cited by the FDA. Takeda was thus unable to fulfill AbbVie’s U.S. Lupron requirements in violation of the supply agreement. Starting in 2020, Takeda failed to provide AbbVie with reliable, sufficient, or timely supplies of Lupron. The liability phase of the trial was conducted over four days in the Spring of 2021 and the Court issued the liability ruling in favor of our client AbbVie in September 2021, finding that Takeda had breached the supply contract in three separate ways. The damages phase of the trial was subsequently held across three days in January 2023. In September of 2023, the Court issued its damages ruling and substantially adopted all of AbbVie’s damages claims and analyses, awarding our client AbbVie lost profit and other damages in the principal sum of $448 million. Takeda ultimately paid a final judgment that, including pre- and post-judgment interest, totaled $505.6 million.

  • We obtained a total defense victory and secured dismissal with prejudice of a bid-rigging and unfair competition lawsuit against Motorola Solutions.    

  • In a two-week breach of contract trial, we defended a leading consumer electronics maker. We won a motion for non-suit on claims for consequential damages and the jury awarded less than half of plaintiff’s demand.

Eileen Ahern    
Product liability and recall    
eahern@willenken.com

  • On behalf of a national hardware retailer, we secured critical motion in limine rulings in Georgia, excluding expert opinions bearing on product defect issues, leading to a favorable settlement on the eve of trial, in a product liability lawsuit where three plaintiffs alleged a gas can explosion caused permanent and disfiguring injuries.    

Jason Wilson
Commercial
jwilson@willenken.com 

  • We represented former executives of a billion-dollar-funded electric vehicle start-up facing allegations of misappropriation of trade secrets, violation of non-solicitation and confidentiality obligations, and breach of fiduciary duties in arbitration. Willenken provided our clients with meaningful strategic counsel and defended against the plaintiff ’s most aggressive discovery tactics. We successfully brought a demurrer that forced the plaintiff to file a Third Amended Demand and started a new clock on document productions and stayed two steps ahead of the plaintiff in forensic discovery. The plaintiff was ultimately forced to come to a global settlement that was very favorable for our clients.    

  • On behalf of Lumens Co., Ltd., a Korean LED manufacturer, we achieved a total victory in a dispute with its distributor over non-payment of goods and allegations of various business torts. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a memorandum disposition affirming Lumens’ victory of summary judgment finalizing the award of $1 million in damages and dismissal of $16 million in counterclaims.    

  • We defended the nation’s largest gas utility in a five-week major personal injury trial. Although the client already stipulated to liability, we staved off punitive damages and the jury awarded less than half of plaintiff’s demand.
Address:
707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 4100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Tel:+1 213 955 9240 Fax:+1 213 955 9250 Email:Contact Us Web Address:http://www.willenken.com
Rankings published in 2025
Dispute resolution
Highly Recommended
83 firms ranked
View full list

Recommended

Adkisson Pitet
1 practice area
View full profile
Allen Matkins
3 practice areas
View profile
Alto Litigation
2 practice areas
View full profile
Altshuler Berzon
2 practice areas
View profile
Andrade Gonzalez
2 practice areas
View profile
Arnold & Porter
10 practice areas
View profile
Bergeson
1 practice area
View profile
Bunsow De Mory
11 practice areas
View full profile
Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass
5 practice areas
View profile
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy
3 practice areas
View profile
DTO Law
1 practice area
View profile
Dan Tan Law
1 practice area
View profile
Davis Wright Tremaine
7 practice areas
View profile
Dechert
1 practice area
View profile
Delman Vukmanovic
1 practice area
View profile
Everett Dorey
1 practice area
View profile
Fish & Richardson
5 practice areas
View profile
Fisher Phillips
2 practice areas
View profile
Glaser Weil
8 practice areas
View profile
Gluck Daniel Atkinson
1 practice area
View profile
Greenberg Gross
2 practice areas
View profile
Haight Brown & Bonesteel
1 practice area
View profile
Halpern May Ybarra Gelberg
2 practice areas
View profile
Hodes Milman
2 practice areas
View profile
Irell & Manella
9 practice areas
View profile
Jones Day
11 practice areas
View profile
Joseph Saveri Law Firm
3 practice areas
View profile
Kasowitz LLP
6 practice areas
View full profile
Kaufhold Gaskin
1 practice area
View full profile
Keller Anderle Scolnick LLP
1 practice area
View profile
Kendall Brill & Kelly
2 practice areas
View profile
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
10 practice areas
View profile
Kinsella Holley Iser Kump Steinsapir
2 practice areas
View profile
Knobbe Martens
9 practice areas
View profile
Kwun Bhansali Lazarus
1 practice area
View profile
Larson LLP
1 practice area
View profile
Lewis & Llewellyn
1 practice area
View profile
Loeb & Loeb
7 practice areas
View profile
Milbank
6 practice areas
View full profile
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
13 practice areas
View profile
Musick Peeler & Garrett
1 practice area
View profile
Proskauer
9 practice areas
View full profile
Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg
6 practice areas
View full profile
Shook Hardy & Bacon
2 practice areas
View profile
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
5 practice areas
View full profile
Stris & Maher
1 practice area
View profile
Swanson & McNamara
2 practice areas
View profile
Turner Boyd Seraphine
1 practice area
View profile
Umberg Zipser
2 practice areas
View profile
Waymaker
2 practice areas
View profile
Weil Gotshal & Manges
8 practice areas
View full profile
White & Case
4 practice areas
View profile
Willkie Farr & Gallagher
1 practice area
View full profile
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
10 practice areas
View profile
Winston Taylor
10 practice areas
View profile

Highly Recommended

Berman Tabacco
3 practice areas
View full profile
Bird Marella LLP
3 practice areas
View profile
Cooley
12 practice areas
View profile
Covington & Burling
5 practice areas
View profile
Davis Polk & Wardwell
6 practice areas
View full profile
Farella Braun & Martel
5 practice areas
View profile
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
9 practice areas
View full profile
Goodwin Procter
1 practice area
View profile
Hueston Hennigan
7 practice areas
View full profile
Keker Van Nest & Peters
9 practice areas
View profile
King & Spalding
8 practice areas
View full profile
Kirkland & Ellis
8 practice areas
View profile
Latham & Watkins
8 practice areas
View full profile
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein
5 practice areas
View profile
Mayer Brown
6 practice areas
View profile
Morrison Foerster
12 practice areas
View profile
Munger Tolles & Olson
10 practice areas
View profile
O'Melveny & Myers
11 practice areas
View profile
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe
12 practice areas
View profile
Paul Hastings
8 practice areas
View profile
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison
2 practice areas
View full profile
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
10 practice areas
View full profile
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd
3 practice areas
View full profile
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
15 practice areas
View profile
Sidley Austin
8 practice areas
View full profile
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom
1 practice area
View full profile
Susman Godfrey
4 practice areas
View full profile
Willenken
1 practice area
View full profile
Linked Reviews
Dispute Resolution

Los Angeles boutique Willenken prides itself on being 100% minority owned as well as its nimble structure that affords it the opportunity to flex its trial capabilities on a frequent basis. While the firm’s primary client base is largely composed of entities domiciled in the same South California environs, the small team is logging big accomplishments of late, with its name and reputation extending well beyond the Golden State borders. A peer quips, “You go to other, bigger, firms, and you say, ‘OK, I’ve got a case that’s going to trial – who’s going to do it?’ and the answer is ‘Uhhh, I don’t know!’ Are you kidding me? That’s not the case with Willenken. Obviously not all of their cases go trial, but they are ready!” It is also noted that the firm is getting more involved in entertainment litigation of late. Willenken made the leap to “Highly Recommended” in the previous edition of Benchmark and remains there this year, an impressive showing for the compact shop.
     The most emblematic example of the firm’s increased reach is its victory, as co-counsel, for a Chicago-based entity in Delaware Chancery Court: a Willenken team led by prolific trial lawyer Paul Loh and also composed of Jason Wilson, Amelia Sargent, and Kenneth Trujillo-Jamison scored big for AbbVie in a long-running and hard-fought commercial case concerning the drug Lupron. This drug was manufactured by Takeda, whose factory got shut down due to regulatory issues, causing a major shortage of Lupron. AbbVie sued for all the lost business, triumphing in March 2024 with a $500 million verdict. The firm’s Delaware co-counsel in the matter testifies on the team’s behalf: “They did a great job, those people are very smart, so it was really cool to work with them and get such a good result. The lead lawyer was Paul Loh – he is great.”Loh was retained by  Home Depot to handle a last-minute personal injury/product liability trial before Los Angeles Superior Court. The incident involved a six-year-old boy who ingested a coin battery that he removed from the remote control of an air conditioner which was purchased from Home Depot. The boy claimed that he suffered a permanent debilitating condition that prevents him from swallowing food or liquid and will require life-long tube feeding and care. The trial commenced in February 2025 and settled on confidential terms after the first trial witness testified. Loh also led a team, which also included Eileen Ahern, that was engaged by Ubee Interactive, a Taiwan-based technology company that manufactures broadband communication devices and solutions, to defend the company against a $14million contractual indemnity claim brought by Charter Communications related to a patent infringement case that was litigated against Charter in the Eastern District of Texas. Charter settled that case and in turn sued Ubee for contractual indemnity because certain cable modems that Ubee sold to Charter allegedly contributed to the accused infringement. Jason Wilson has been retained by Open AI to represent it in a trademark infringement suit against OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT. OpenAI alleged that Open AI’s use of its name is confusing to consumers and could damage OpenAI's reputation. Wilson argued in October 2024 before the Ninth Circuit that it has a right to use the name because its trademark was registered first.Additionally, Wilson and his team requested to vacate the injunction blocking Open AI from using its trademark while the trademark infringement lawsuit is pending. In February 2025, the court allowed a trademark infringement counterclaim brought by Open AI to proceed against OpenAI, finding that Wilson’s client has plausibly alleged that its mark became associated with AI tools before OpenAI became known for ChatGPT. Wilson will also serve as the lead trial counsel in this case that is scheduled for trial in October 2025. 

 

4 results4 results
Sponsored